ST. CLOUD, FL — Governor Ron DeSantis announced Monday that his administration will appeal a federal judge’s ruling that struck down a key provision of Florida’s controversial book ban law, HB 1069. At a press conference, DeSantis declared, “We will be vindicated in this,” defending the law’s intent to remove books that “describe sexual conduct” from public school libraries.
U.S. District Judge Carlos Mendoza ruled last week that the statute was unconstitutionally vague, writing that it was “unclear what the statute actually prohibits.” The law, signed by DeSantis in 2023, has been used to remove thousands of books from school shelves, including contemporary classics like The Handmaid’s Tale in Volusia and Orange counties.
The lawsuit was brought by Penguin Random House, five other publishers, the Authors Guild, and a group of parents and authors. Mendoza’s ruling was hailed as a victory for First Amendment rights, with Penguin Random House calling it “a sweeping victory for the right to read”.
DeSantis, however, doubled down on the law’s purpose, stating, “We’re here to do math and reading and science. We’re not here to inject gender theory. That’s just not appropriate in the schools”. His administration has long defended the removals under the “government speech” doctrine, which Mendoza rejected as insufficient justification for sweeping content bans.
📚 Now Let Us Tell You What the Daytona Beach News-Journal Did Not:
- Volusia County’s Role: While the News-Journal mentioned local removals, it did not highlight that Volusia was one of the epicenters of the purge, with over 20 titles removed—including books by LGBTQ+ authors and those addressing racial injustice. These removals were not just administrative—they were ideological.
- The “Government Speech” Loophole: The News-Journal failed to unpack how Florida’s legal team leaned on a doctrine that allows the state to promote its own views without offering a platform for dissent. Mendoza’s ruling dismantled that argument, stating that “slapping the label of government speech on book removals only serves to stifle the disfavored viewpoints”.
- The Broader Pattern: This ruling comes amid a wave of legal challenges to DeSantis-backed education policies, including restrictions on pronoun usage and curriculum content. Another federal judge recently ruled that the same law discriminated based on sex, a decision the News-Journal barely acknowledged.
- The Appeal Strategy: Florida’s chief deputy solicitor general, Jason Muehlhoff, called the ruling a “bad decision” and confirmed the state’s intent to appeal. But what’s missing from mainstream coverage is the broader legal gamble: Florida is betting that higher courts will uphold vague, sweeping bans that critics say target marginalized voices.
---
📢 DISCLAIMER:
This article is a satirical and editorialized response to recent news coverage. While based on verified reporting and public statements, it includes commentary and analysis not found in traditional outlets. Edgewater Community News is committed to amplifying underrepresented perspectives and challenging sanitized narratives. We encourage readers to engage critically and seek out multiple sources.
Add comment
Comments