In a sweeping legal maneuver, The Trump Organization LLC and DTTM Operations LLC have filed a federal lawsuit targeting unauthorized use of the TRUMP trademark across online marketplaces. The complaint, lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, alleges that third-party vendors have been improperly selling products featuring the TRUMP mark without permission, violating federal trademark law.
The lawsuit, structured as a Schedule A case, enables the plaintiffs to pursue legal action against a broad array of unnamed sellers—many of whom operate on platforms like Amazon, eBay, Walmart, and Spreadshop—without incurring individual filing fees for each defendant. According to the complaint, these sellers have marketed “inferior imitations” of merchandise such as mugs, apparel, and novelty items, causing “confusion and deception in the marketplace”.
🛍️ Spreadshop’s Preventive Action
In response to the litigation, Spreadshop has announced the removal of all designs from its platform that feature the TRUMP mark. The company emphasized that this action is not a reflection of political bias or an attempt to suppress free expression, but rather a legal necessity to comply with trademark law and avoid potential liability.
> “We know this may be frustrating and disappointing, and we are sincerely sorry for the inconvenience,” Spreadshop stated in a public notice. “This decision is not about limiting your voice or your viewpoints… It is a necessary response to enforce federal trademark law.”
Spreadshop encouraged creators to continue uploading original designs that do not infringe on third-party intellectual property. The platform reaffirmed its commitment to supporting diverse voices and artistic expression, within the bounds of legal compliance.
📜 Disclaimer
This article includes information regarding ongoing litigation initiated by The Trump Organization LLC and DTTM Operations LLC concerning the use of federally registered TRUMP trademarks. For a copy of the official complaint, readers are directed to PACER Monitor’s case listing.
As the case proceeds, legal experts are watching closely to see how courts interpret the scope of trademark enforcement in the digital marketplace—especially as political merchandise continues to be a lucrative and contested domain.
Add comment
Comments